I Can't Do That Dave

New desktop image:

Shorties

• 17:02 trying to hold the DIY line #
• 22:23 second coat #

Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter

Why Aren't You Listening to Me?

The other day I needed one of the students to do something for me, so I poked my head in the door and started talking to the back of her head.


Sort of disrespectfully the student ignored me, so I repeated myself. Still nothing. Finally, incensed I come into the office to do something overt to get her attention - and see this:


Oops.

Shorties

• 00:00 RT @CarnegieMellon: Pres. Obama to visit Carnegie Mellon on Wednesday! We'll let you know when we have details. #
• 00:37 @aerdin congrats, you'll be that much more suited for next time! #

Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter

Shorties

• 13:46 @APBBlue trudat #
• 14:33 @walt828 bit.ly/9X84gv Supreme NYLACHI #
• 16:42 @sdeutsch bring some spare people? #
• 22:37 @aerdin with free beer and food at Marisa's. Hmm #
• 00:49 @ebertchicago would that they'd cast Kevin Bacon as the preacher. #

Automatically shipped by LoudT witter

Six Flags Great America keeps history alive with rebirth of the Little Dipper Roller Coaster

Themepark Insider: When Kiddieland Amusement Park in Melrose Park, Illinois closed after over 80 years, there were fears that many of their iconic rides were going to be destroyed. However, Kiddieland’s Illinois Neighbor, Six Flags Great America, felt that part of Kiddieland should still be enjoyed by the Chicagoland guests.

Shorties

• 11:14 @frontrowcenter5 que? #
• 11:46 Found my toolbelt! #
• 16:03 Waste time here: bit.ly/aMQAgx #6dobs #
• 17:33 Anyone out there in the world got a printer/cutter to recommend - or not recommend? I have some funds for an acquisition. #
• 19:11 I mean geez Kevin, it's just a ring, let it go yfrog.com/izr2cj #
• 23:39 OH! MY! GOD! #

Automatically shipped by < a href="http://www.loudtwitter.com">LoudTwitter

Pick a School

In response to this:

... As long as I'm here, I'll bring up another topic I'm passionate about:
Choose an institution of higher learning not by the quality or newness of its equipment or facilities, but for its faculty and program. All the state-of-the-art whiz-bang gizmos don't mean squat if the professors don't know how to teach, or don't know how to use the "toys" themselves. Besides interviewing potential professors and current students, a campus visit should also include seeing a performance. Now while it's possible a HS student will be impressed with any college production, it's not always a given. I once saw a production at a "name" theatre school, with an MFA program, and the production values were so poor there is no way I could ever recommend that school. Now that I think about it, that's happened at two different schools.

Another thing--I'm leery of any school where the students design too much. (Controversial statement? Please continue reading with an open mind, before responding.)
My college allowed only seniors to design mainstage productions, and rarely if ever would allow more than one student designer on a production. I see too many students who have designed many shows, but without proper supervision. Therefore, they lack critical analysis of their work, and don't know how to collaborate or defend/explain their design decisions. IMO, design is best learned via the mentor method, not on one's own in a vacuum. Choose a college, primarily, because of its faculty.

I just said this:

I would say that "Choose an institution of higher learning not by the quality or newness of its equipment or facilities, but for its faculty and program." is fairly on point. The real red herring here is often facility, in that whiz-bang facility doesn't always make a whiz-bang program. Both times I was a theatre student it was in less than state of the art venues and in some ways I think that actually enhanced the experience.

I would say it really is about the faculty, and to a lesser degree about the classes. Who are they, what have they done, what will be your access, and what are they actually going to offer in terms of education. At this point I don't think I could possibly recommend a program where there isn't an established, specific curriculum they can discuss with you.

With respect to gear, in the more technical specialties you likely do want to be sure you will have some experience on contemporary equipment. So again, having it doesn't mean for sure it is the right place, but different from facility, not having it does make a difference. Keep in mind though that there are many avenues at school to using cool gear. Where I work now we own a good chunk, but we also rent often, and there are other organizations on campus with a good inventory as well. So if the answer to "Do you have the newest shiny thing?" is no, ask about other opportunities to get the exposure before writing them off.

Designing, or more specifically "Another thing--I'm leery of any school where the students design too much." I think this is more about faculty than opportunities. As a design student you want to design, as a technical student you want to engineer and implement, as a manager you want to manage; these are all good and necessary experiences. It's not so much about how often as it is about how prepared and how supported.

Let's use "working" to catch all disciplines. If you are working a lot, but it starts as an underclassman and the faculty travels often... that may be less desirable than not getting to it until later. If you are working before you've had class prep for the tasks involved that might be less desirable. If faculty aren't in the shops or in the theatres that might be less desirable.

Conversely you also might want to watch out for programs where everything is done by faculty, staff or locals. Whether you design, engineer, or manage you want the opportunity to be the one actually doing it. So when researching, the level of student involvement is as important to research as they level of faculty involvement. I don't think you can make an assessment based solely on the number of opportunities. It's the nature and quality of the opportunity that matters.

The conversation picks up here.

Shorties

• 13:38 RT @ebertchicago: Opening all over: The "Grease" singalong. "You're the One That I Want." j.mp/cKNOtX #
• 13:39 RT @CarnegieMellCFA: School of Drama announces 10-11 season (including a banned German play) - check out the list here: bit.ly/arPtYU #
• 13:42 RT @ebertchicago: My review of SATC2. These people make my skin crawl. j.mp/btqcjT #
• 14:23 paneracommuting #
• 17:12 moving people from "students" to "old students" on AIM #
• 18:28 @caryatiddreams oops #
• 18:30 @aerdin did I miss something? #
• 21:53 @mattigray I seriously beg to differ, maybe *this* Chicago, but the band of my formative years definitely held up to the city. #
• 23:18 Maybe Orlando is for real afterall #

Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter

Shorties

• 11:39 RT @backstagejobs: U2's health woes mean 1000's of stagehands have less work this summer. tinyurl.com/3yay8e3 #
• 11:40 RT @WDUQ_News: WDUQ- Santorum Will Decide On White House Run After November: Former Republican U.S. Senator Rick Sa... bit.ly/9lgZnQ #
• 12:23 Great. Sunscreen facilitates skin cancer: bit.ly/cXlZlS Next? Toothpaste causes cavities. #
• 12:28 It's #towelday bit.ly/MqUZK #
• 14:35 If The Fed is making all kinds of money off the bailouts: bit.ly/cS7N3P then did we actually *need* a bailout? Prolly a timing thing #
• 14:36 @bpeoples You do live right down the street from Barbara #
• 16:30 @rachelyra welcome to my world #
• 17:14 Just called GPA "position information" So what would the grading equivalents to velocity and acceleration be? #
• 19:57 Tamari #
• 23:49 Nice job Los Suns #

Automatically shipped by Lo udTwitter